Wednesday, July 28, 2010

WHY IS EVERY OLD ENGLISH ANTIQUE CALLED GEORGIAN?



"Why is every English antique called Georgian?" What an excellent question! Oh what the hell, why be diplomatic at this point? That's an incredibly moronic question. But I do understand why someone would ask it.


All English antique furniture is not just called Georgian. But the term "Georgian" covers such a vast period of time that people often think that if it's English and it's really old, then it must be Georgian. But they're wrong.


English Georgian furniture covers the reigns of first three English King George's: George I 1714-1727 (called Early Georgian), George II 1727-1760 (called Mid Georgian), and most of the reign on George III 1760-1820 (called Late Georgian).


The Regency period (that is, the English period that FOLLOWS Georgian) starts around 1811, when George III was mentally incapacitated and his nit-wit son, the Prince of Wales, was appointed Prince Regent. The Prince Regent became George IV on the death of his poor deranged pop in 1820.

Watch the movie "The Madness of King George" for details. It's really good. Here's actor Nigel Hoffman as George III when he was nuts:


Semi-interesting factoid
: George IV was apparently quite the jerk. Very few people (even at his death) had anything nice to say about him. He was lazy, a glutton, a womanizer, a gambler, a tub-of-lard, and a heroin addict. Wait, that describes most of my friends! Anyhow, George IV was one of England's most despised monarchs.


But back to our story: so I think it's best to think of English Regency furniture (again, the English period following Georgian) as around 1810-1830 (George IV died in 1830) but include the vast majority of George III's reign as "late" Georgian. So, the last 10 years of George III's reign along with the entire reign of George IV is not called Georgian, it's called English Regency.


With that said, you can see that the term "Georgian furniture" still covers a vast period of time: over 100 years of history, encompassing most of the 18th century as well as the early part of the 19th. And hence the misunderstanding that all English antiques are Georgian.

Handy antique tip:
If you get cornered and are compelled to describe a random antique piece of English furniture, if you say it's "Georgian", there's a pretty good chance that you'll be right! And even if you're not, 99.9% of people wouldn't know Georgian if it bit them in the rear. So you'll probably look knowledgeable whether you're right or wrong! But read on and you'll understand what Georgian furniture is and is not.


At this point you may be wondering: "Hey Buzz, if George I, II and most of George III's reigns are all called Georgian, then how come George IV's reign isn't also called Georgian?" And the answer is, "Because I says so." In other words, hey, I don't make up these rules, I just report on them. Or as we used to say in high school (or in my case to this very day), "Like it or lump it." Lovely, huh?

Georgian furniture is generally characterized by a simple elegance that is more stately than earlier English periods like Jacobean, (pronounced "JACK oh bee in" and NOT "juh COE bee in" which makes me crazy) (1600-1625) and Queen Anne (1702-1714).

For instance, rather than the extensive carvings that characterizes Jacobean furniture or the frequent use of cabriole legs in Queen Anne furniture, Georgian furniture saw more conservative, imposing designs that reflected the English return to a more neoclassical sensibility. Here's a good example of carved Jacobean furniture, this piece a folding "monk's bench":


And yet when compared to the French Neoclassical Louis XVI and Empire periods, Georgian style is clearly simpler, reflecting England's more conservative/understated penchant (that's a generalization of course and stands in stark contrast to English Palladian furniture which is completely lavish and over the top, but I'll explain that in a later post).


I should mention that the three phases of Georgian period furniture are often hard to identify from each other because often overlap. For that reason, examples of each Georgian phase are often really transitional amalgamations and sometimes look downright anachronistic. Look at this early Georgian wing chair--you might think that it's Mid-Georgian because of its cabriole legs, right? But it dates to George I:


As a general rule, however, it's safe to say that as the 18th century moved from Early Georgian to Mid Georgian, mahogany replaced walnut as the favorite wood of choice. And the George II taste favored lighter color palettes, designs and decoration. And then as George II period was eclipsed by George III, there was a pretty strict return to neoclassical design, with straight lines replacing the curves of the Mid-Georgian period. Again, a generalization but then with Georgian furniture you need to generalize.


Examples of distinct characteristics of George I/Early Georgian furniture would include a general absence of intricate carvings as well as the use of turned or square-tapered legs instead of cabriole or French baroque style. Even so, Georgian cabinetmakers employed a great deal of knowledge that was developed in other periods and styles, including the classic gate leg table design that finds its origin in the Jacobean period. Ornamental inlays were preserved, the most common among them being crossbanding, as shown here:


By the mid 18th century England, the Mid-Georgian period, reflects the transition to the rococo style of France, but interpreted by the English in a much more subdued and staid way.

The designs of Thomas Chippendale's Directory of 1754 reflect the English taste for the French rococo including Chinoiserie. This represented something of a temporary departure from the classical order and a move towards more whimsical designs, and frequent asymmetry, as shown here:


As the 18th century moved into its last 4o years, we see tremendous innovation in furniture design (such as the sideboard) and the third phase of the Georgian period, George III (Late Georgian).

Late Georgian style is primarily neoclassical as was developed by the likes of Robert Adam. Adam rejected the curves of Rococo and evolved a new style characterized by symmetrical lines, attractive lighter proportions, geometric shapes and an abundance of neoclassical motifs. Take a look at this Robert Adams "Etruscan" room in Osterley Park House, circa 1761:

George Hepplewhite popularized Adam's designs in his 'Guide' of 1788 while Thomas Sheraton heralded a new era with his 'Drawing Book' of 1791-1794. Furniture of this period is characteristically light and elegant. Straight, tapering legs are typical of Late Georgian chairs, as are geometrical forms and the use of Greek and Roman patterns. Look at the legs of this George III chair and the neoclassical pediment on this George III breakfront:



Monday, July 26, 2010

WORD OF THE DAY: TAMBOUR



A tambour (pronounced “TAM bore”) is a type of door you see on antiques as well as modern furniture and other applications.

A tambour door is really pretty ingenious when you think about it. It's a flexible sliding door made up of lots of small slats that interlock and rotate, typically on a rail to open and close:

Tambours are often seen on desks, cabinets, sideboards, etc. You also see them in unlikely places like kitchens (called "appliance garages"-love that term and wish I had a Miata to park in it) and even on real garages.

These doors are made up of several interlocking slats that typically run along rails. But in some cases, the slats are simply glued onto a fabric track that rolls up and down or side to side. This 19th century English sideboard at C. Mariani Antiques, has two handsome tambour doors that run on fabric backing and slide side to side to reveal the two compartments at the top.

In the bum rap category, most people associate tambour doors with those oh-so-tired turn of the century rolltop desks (ugh) like this one:

Lovely, huh? Where's my macrame hanging with my wandering Jew?

But not all tambour desks are light oak, ugly, and "belonged to Uncle Leo, so we're keeping it!". Look at this beautiful 19th century mahogany George III one:



Sunday, July 25, 2010

THE THREE MINI-PERIODS OF GEORGIAN FURNITURE



In my last post, we looked at an overview of Georgian furniture from the reign of George I in the first quarter to the reign of George II around mid-century and ending with the reign of George III, beginning in 1760.

Now let's look at each of these three Georgian "mini-periods" separately:

Early Georgian (George I, 1714-1727)-architectural in style, heavier and symmetrical, more in the Baroque taste):





Mid Georgian (George II, 1727-1760)-lighter and more curvy, more in the Rococo taste but also more subdued than French or Italian Rococo; mahogany replaces walnut as the wood of choice:



Late Georgian (George III, 1760-until Regency 1820)-designs are in the Neoclassical taste:








Now forget everything we've learned about Georgian I, II and III furniture because in my next post down we're going to talk about the red herring (mmmm. I love herring) of Georgian 18th century English furniture, the style known as Palladian.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

A STYLE UNTO ITSELF: ENGLISH PALLADIAN FURNITURE



The opulent English furniture style known as Palladian emerged during the early and mid Georgian periods but it stands in marked contrast to Georgian pieces of that time.



These oddball and wildly luxe Palladian antiques are sometimes called Georgian, Georgian Palladian, or just Palladian. Technically, all these names are correct, but for the sake of clarity (and sanity!), it's best to describe them as Palladian because they look so different from all the other antiques that we call Georgian.


Why so different? Because the Palladian style was developed exclusively for the small and extremely wealthy English upper class, composed of families that were really not part of the English mainstream.

This luxurious and frequently gilded furniture was destined for the great country homes, mansions, and palaces of England. As a consequence, Georgian Palladian furniture had little lasting influence on English furniture, never making the leap to common use and acceptance in the Georgian mainstream.

And yet the Palladian look is highly prized because it works so well with other European period pieces. Look how great this Palladian pier mirror looks when paired with a 19th c. French Empire (pronounced AHM peer and dating from 1799-1814) Georges Jacob console:


When taken out of context, away from the matching interior decoration of the rooms it was designed for (see the room pictured at the beginning of this post), Palladian furniture seems weird, massively over-scaled and way out of synch with Early Georgian or Mid Georgian taste.


And indeed, Palladian furniture is over-the-top ornate, huge, only barely movable and typically embellished with lavish carving. It's really sculpture-like and could just as easily been carved out of stone rather than wood. Look at this Palladian oak doll house to see what I mean:


At C. Mariani, we have an incomparable pair of English Palladian console tables from the estate of George Randolph Hearst Sr. And they can be yours for only $250,000 USD (and if you call in the next 10 minutes I'll thrown in a Sham-Wow dish towel perfect for cleaning those Issori verde marble tops!). Here's one of the pair:



Palladian furniture used many neoclassical elements such as elaborate pediments, masks, eagles (as in the Hearst consoles) and sphinxes. Here is a George II William Kent Palladian mirror that demonstrates the neoclassical influence:


Palladian furniture pieces included side tables and pier tables, usually with marble tops, chairs with top-rail crestings of shells, and legs graced with fish-scaled scrolls, as well as bookcases and gilt wood mirrors.


Often Misunderstood Factoid: A few clients of mine INSIST that the scrolly big-headed fish motif you see above and also on a lot of French 18th century antiques is a STURGEON. A sturgeon? "Pass the caviar please and sorry, but no." These are stylized DOLPHINS, thank you very much.

Palladian furniture was also largely inspired by classical architecture elements.


Apart from William Kent, other designers of this time who did at least some Palladian style work were Benjamin Goodison, James Moore, Giles Grency, John Channon, and John Vardy. Here is a gilt wood Palladian bench attributed to Vardy: